<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 191 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the refund claim of additional duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus must be filed within one year, as per Notification No. 93/2008-Cus and Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in allowing the refund, and the Tribunal set aside the decision, rejecting the claim. The Department&#039;s appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory time limits for refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:35:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 191 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the refund claim of additional duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus must be filed within one year, as per Notification No. 93/2008-Cus and Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in allowing the refund, and the Tribunal set aside the decision, rejecting the claim. The Department&#039;s appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory time limits for refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>