<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 176 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal due to the delay exceeding the condonable limit set by the statute. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and previous judgments, emphasizing the limited authority of the appellate body to condone delays. The appellant&#039;s arguments for condonation under the Limitation Act were not accepted, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:34:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 176 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal due to the delay exceeding the condonable limit set by the statute. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and previous judgments, emphasizing the limited authority of the appellate body to condone delays. The appellant&#039;s arguments for condonation under the Limitation Act were not accepted, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>