<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 173 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of a show cause notice issued to a Public Sector Bank for service tax on activities, despite being sent to the Head Office instead of branch offices. It ruled that centralized registration and non-payment of service tax for the mentioned services precluded the Head Office from contesting jurisdiction. Various services were examined for taxability, with exemptions for mutual funds and Government Bonds. The Tribunal deemed the demand for service tax on credit card sales before 01.05.2006 unsustainable. Due to lack of merit, the Tribunal set aside demands, interest, and penalties imposed by the Commissioner, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 173 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of a show cause notice issued to a Public Sector Bank for service tax on activities, despite being sent to the Head Office instead of branch offices. It ruled that centralized registration and non-payment of service tax for the mentioned services precluded the Head Office from contesting jurisdiction. Various services were examined for taxability, with exemptions for mutual funds and Government Bonds. The Tribunal deemed the demand for service tax on credit card sales before 01.05.2006 unsustainable. Due to lack of merit, the Tribunal set aside demands, interest, and penalties imposed by the Commissioner, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>