<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15059</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the tax case petitions as no legal questions were found to be involved in the issues raised. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions on directing the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, reassessments under section 147(b), disallowance of salary and maintenance expenses, employer-employee relationship, appointment justification, relationship with the director, and depreciation on a building were upheld based on factual evidence and lack of legal errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:41:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15059</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the tax case petitions as no legal questions were found to be involved in the issues raised. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions on directing the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, reassessments under section 147(b), disallowance of salary and maintenance expenses, employer-employee relationship, appointment justification, relationship with the director, and depreciation on a building were upheld based on factual evidence and lack of legal errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>