https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369823 The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority's decision, confirming the legality of the appellant's CENVAT credit as the successor to the predecessor company. The appeal for recovery of irregularly taken credit amounting to Rs. 20,55,937 was rejected, emphasizing the validity of the credit under the demerger context and procedural compliance. The Tribunal found no legal basis to interfere with the order, concluding that the appellant was entitled to the disputed credit based on a detailed analysis of the demerger order and credit transfer. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:34:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369823 The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority's decision, confirming the legality of the appellant's CENVAT credit as the successor to the predecessor company. The appeal for recovery of irregularly taken credit amounting to Rs. 20,55,937 was rejected, emphasizing the validity of the credit under the demerger context and procedural compliance. The Tribunal found no legal basis to interfere with the order, concluding that the appellant was entitled to the disputed credit based on a detailed analysis of the demerger order and credit transfer. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369823