<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 162 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369819</link>
    <description>The Court disposed of the Petition without disturbing the attachment of the residential house until the Tribunal&#039;s final decision on the Appeal. The Respondents were prohibited from taking coercive actions to recover dues by selling the residential flat during the pendency of the Appeal process, ensuring the security of amounts due to the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 162 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369819</link>
      <description>The Court disposed of the Petition without disturbing the attachment of the residential house until the Tribunal&#039;s final decision on the Appeal. The Respondents were prohibited from taking coercive actions to recover dues by selling the residential flat during the pendency of the Appeal process, ensuring the security of amounts due to the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>