<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 151 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369808</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for payment of differential duty between Unit-I and Unit-II for Central Excise Duty, emphasizing the revenue neutrality principle. The decision, supported by the Supreme Court, highlighted that the transfer of goods between units of the same manufacturer should be treated as revenue-neutral, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:33:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 151 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369808</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for payment of differential duty between Unit-I and Unit-II for Central Excise Duty, emphasizing the revenue neutrality principle. The decision, supported by the Supreme Court, highlighted that the transfer of goods between units of the same manufacturer should be treated as revenue-neutral, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>