<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 145 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369802</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the demand notice for interest on belated tax payment, remitting the matter for fresh consideration. It held that reopening assessment solely based on Audit Party&#039;s opinion violates principles of natural justice. The Assessing Officer must independently form a view, issue notice, consider objections, and pass orders. The respondent was directed to decide on merits, providing the petitioner a fair opportunity for a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 145 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369802</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the demand notice for interest on belated tax payment, remitting the matter for fresh consideration. It held that reopening assessment solely based on Audit Party&#039;s opinion violates principles of natural justice. The Assessing Officer must independently form a view, issue notice, consider objections, and pass orders. The respondent was directed to decide on merits, providing the petitioner a fair opportunity for a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>