<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1397 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276248</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI directed the appellant to file a reply within a specified period regarding the allegation of inappropriate Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of natural justice and granted the appellant an opportunity to defend the allegations. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for review and decision based on the appellant&#039;s reply, maintaining transparency and adherence to legal procedures without delving into the merits of the case initially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:31:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1397 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276248</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI directed the appellant to file a reply within a specified period regarding the allegation of inappropriate Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of natural justice and granted the appellant an opportunity to defend the allegations. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for review and decision based on the appellant&#039;s reply, maintaining transparency and adherence to legal procedures without delving into the merits of the case initially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>