<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1082 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276245</link>
    <description>While granting anticipatory bail, conditions under Section 438 CrPC must be reasonable and aimed at securing the accused&#039;s presence and the integrity of the investigation, not at recovering alleged dues as if enforcing a civil liability. A monetary condition based on the accused&#039;s undertaking and part payment was left undisturbed, but the more onerous payment-linked requirement was modified because it was severe and impracticable. The Court allowed a corporate guarantee in place of the challenged monetary condition, subject to the Magistrate&#039;s satisfaction as to solvency, and the substantive grant of bail remained intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 12:37:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1082 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276245</link>
      <description>While granting anticipatory bail, conditions under Section 438 CrPC must be reasonable and aimed at securing the accused&#039;s presence and the integrity of the investigation, not at recovering alleged dues as if enforcing a civil liability. A monetary condition based on the accused&#039;s undertaking and part payment was left undisturbed, but the more onerous payment-linked requirement was modified because it was severe and impracticable. The Court allowed a corporate guarantee in place of the challenged monetary condition, subject to the Magistrate&#039;s satisfaction as to solvency, and the substantive grant of bail remained intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>