<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 20 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15055</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled that the income from the business run by trustees after partition should be assessed as an association of persons (AOP), not individually for each beneficiary. The court found that the trust deed and the conduct of the parties implied consent from the guardian, forming an AOP. It emphasized the intention to form an AOP was evident from joint management and income generation, meeting the criteria established by the Supreme Court. The court also held that the guardian&#039;s consent was implied, dismissing the Tribunal&#039;s view. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and awarded costs to the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:28:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 20 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15055</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled that the income from the business run by trustees after partition should be assessed as an association of persons (AOP), not individually for each beneficiary. The court found that the trust deed and the conduct of the parties implied consent from the guardian, forming an AOP. It emphasized the intention to form an AOP was evident from joint management and income generation, meeting the criteria established by the Supreme Court. The court also held that the guardian&#039;s consent was implied, dismissing the Tribunal&#039;s view. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and awarded costs to the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>