<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (1) TMI 61 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276232</link>
    <description>Parliament had legislative competence to levy gift-tax on transfers of agricultural lands under the Gift-tax Act, 1958, because the Act is in substance a tax on gifts and not on land. Taxing power must be found expressly, and no entry in List II covers a tax on gifts or transfer of property. Entry 97 of List I, read with Article 248, supports Parliament&#039;s residuary power to impose taxes not assigned to the State or Concurrent Lists. Entry 18 of List II on land and agricultural land does not imply a taxing power, and Entry 47 on succession to agricultural lands does not extend to inter vivos gifts. The Act was therefore valid despite its incidental effect on agricultural lands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 15:03:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (1) TMI 61 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276232</link>
      <description>Parliament had legislative competence to levy gift-tax on transfers of agricultural lands under the Gift-tax Act, 1958, because the Act is in substance a tax on gifts and not on land. Taxing power must be found expressly, and no entry in List II covers a tax on gifts or transfer of property. Entry 97 of List I, read with Article 248, supports Parliament&#039;s residuary power to impose taxes not assigned to the State or Concurrent Lists. Entry 18 of List II on land and agricultural land does not imply a taxing power, and Entry 47 on succession to agricultural lands does not extend to inter vivos gifts. The Act was therefore valid despite its incidental effect on agricultural lands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>