https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369780 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, treating the transaction of shares as Long-Term Capital Gain. It held that the evidence provided sufficiently proved the purchase date of 11.06.2003, rejecting the Revenue's contention based on trade timing discrepancy. The AO's failure to conduct further inquiries was noted, emphasizing the adequacy of the documents submitted by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 29th October 2018. en-us Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Nov 2018 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369780 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, treating the transaction of shares as Long-Term Capital Gain. It held that the evidence provided sufficiently proved the purchase date of 11.06.2003, rejecting the Revenue's contention based on trade timing discrepancy. The AO's failure to conduct further inquiries was noted, emphasizing the adequacy of the documents submitted by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 29th October 2018. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369780