<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 112 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369769</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the transfer of shares under the family arrangement was not taxable as it did not constitute a &quot;transfer&quot; under the Income-tax Act. The reopening of the assessment under Section 147 was deemed invalid due to the prior acceptance of the family settlement by the Commissioner. The non-compete fee received as part of the family settlement was also not taxable. The order was pronounced on 24th July 2018 at Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 112 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369769</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the transfer of shares under the family arrangement was not taxable as it did not constitute a &quot;transfer&quot; under the Income-tax Act. The reopening of the assessment under Section 147 was deemed invalid due to the prior acceptance of the family settlement by the Commissioner. The non-compete fee received as part of the family settlement was also not taxable. The order was pronounced on 24th July 2018 at Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>