<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1624 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the assessing officer to delete the ad hoc disallowance of business promotion expenses for AY 2012-13. The decision emphasized the lack of discrepancy in the assessee&#039;s books of accounts and the absence of concrete evidence to support the disallowance. The Tribunal concluded that the expenses were solely for business purposes, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 13:43:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1624 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the assessing officer to delete the ad hoc disallowance of business promotion expenses for AY 2012-13. The decision emphasized the lack of discrepancy in the assessee&#039;s books of accounts and the absence of concrete evidence to support the disallowance. The Tribunal concluded that the expenses were solely for business purposes, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>