https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369762 The Madras HC set aside the rejection of a claim for recognition of alternate export products under the EPCG scheme and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The Court noted that the petitioner was not given an adequate opportunity to substantiate its factual assertions on earlier exports, the export ban on principal products, and the claimed extension of the licence period. It held that the competing contentions on delayed invocation, expiry of the licence, and possible retrospective operation of the alternate-product facility required reconsideration on merits by the EPCG authority after hearing the petitioner. The connected writ challenging the earlier review order did not survive independently. en-us Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Nov 2018 09:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369762 The Madras HC set aside the rejection of a claim for recognition of alternate export products under the EPCG scheme and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The Court noted that the petitioner was not given an adequate opportunity to substantiate its factual assertions on earlier exports, the export ban on principal products, and the claimed extension of the licence period. It held that the competing contentions on delayed invocation, expiry of the licence, and possible retrospective operation of the alternate-product facility required reconsideration on merits by the EPCG authority after hearing the petitioner. The connected writ challenging the earlier review order did not survive independently. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369762