https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369757 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal and Order-in-Original, rejecting the Revenue's appeal. The respondent's actions did not show intent to evade duty, as they clarified valuation charges in response to an audit query. The Tribunal noted the department's acceptance of the clarification and subsequent assessment without objections. Emphasizing the respondent's bonafide belief, lack of fraudulent intent, and the department's inaction, the Tribunal deemed the orders correct and without infirmity, underscoring the importance of compliance and departmental responses in customs duty matters. en-us Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Nov 2018 13:42:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369757 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal and Order-in-Original, rejecting the Revenue's appeal. The respondent's actions did not show intent to evade duty, as they clarified valuation charges in response to an audit query. The Tribunal noted the department's acceptance of the clarification and subsequent assessment without objections. Emphasizing the respondent's bonafide belief, lack of fraudulent intent, and the department's inaction, the Tribunal deemed the orders correct and without infirmity, underscoring the importance of compliance and departmental responses in customs duty matters. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369757