<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 92 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369749</link>
    <description>Activity involving scrap and slag removal, segregation, cleaning, transportation and allied operations for steel manufacturers was held not to fall within Business Support Service under Section 65(105)(zzzq) of the Finance Act, 1994. The service was not closely analogous to the statutory examples of customer-related services, logistics, accounting, marketing assistance, infrastructural support or transaction processing, so the levy of service tax under Section 66 could not be sustained. The analysis also states that saleability of the scrap, use of heavy machinery and labour, or tax treatment of another assessee did not change the true character of the service for classification purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 92 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369749</link>
      <description>Activity involving scrap and slag removal, segregation, cleaning, transportation and allied operations for steel manufacturers was held not to fall within Business Support Service under Section 65(105)(zzzq) of the Finance Act, 1994. The service was not closely analogous to the statutory examples of customer-related services, logistics, accounting, marketing assistance, infrastructural support or transaction processing, so the levy of service tax under Section 66 could not be sustained. The analysis also states that saleability of the scrap, use of heavy machinery and labour, or tax treatment of another assessee did not change the true character of the service for classification purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>