https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369737 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners in a case challenging communications from the Commissioner demanding pre-deposit in cash instead of cenvat credit for maintaining appeals related to availing cenvat credit on sales promotion charges. The court held that there is no statutory bar on using cenvat credit for pre-deposit, citing precedents from various courts. It found the Commissioner's insistence on cash deposit incorrect, quashed the communications, accepted the pre-deposit made through cenvat credit, and directed the Commissioner to hear the appeals on their merits. en-us Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Dec 2018 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369737 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners in a case challenging communications from the Commissioner demanding pre-deposit in cash instead of cenvat credit for maintaining appeals related to availing cenvat credit on sales promotion charges. The court held that there is no statutory bar on using cenvat credit for pre-deposit, citing precedents from various courts. It found the Commissioner's insistence on cash deposit incorrect, quashed the communications, accepted the pre-deposit made through cenvat credit, and directed the Commissioner to hear the appeals on their merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369737