<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 78 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the original authority, finding that the Commissioner(Appeals) failed to address all grounds raised by the appellant and wrongly denied rectification of computation errors. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a fresh decision considering all evidence and documents provided by the appellant, ensuring a comprehensive review before reaching a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 13:40:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 78 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the original authority, finding that the Commissioner(Appeals) failed to address all grounds raised by the appellant and wrongly denied rectification of computation errors. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a fresh decision considering all evidence and documents provided by the appellant, ensuring a comprehensive review before reaching a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>