<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 77 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369734</link>
    <description>The Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the provisional release of trucks seized during an investigation into illegal activities. Despite the dispute over ownership due to non-transfer in RTO records, the appellant&#039;s purchase, payment, and possession of the trucks were established. The appellant&#039;s request for release was supported by legal precedents and the original owner&#039;s affidavit. The trucks were to be provisionally released upon furnishing a security bond, with conditions imposed on disposal and vehicle production. The appellant was required to provide security bonds for verification before release, concluding the appeal in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 21:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 77 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369734</link>
      <description>The Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the provisional release of trucks seized during an investigation into illegal activities. Despite the dispute over ownership due to non-transfer in RTO records, the appellant&#039;s purchase, payment, and possession of the trucks were established. The appellant&#039;s request for release was supported by legal precedents and the original owner&#039;s affidavit. The trucks were to be provisionally released upon furnishing a security bond, with conditions imposed on disposal and vehicle production. The appellant was required to provide security bonds for verification before release, concluding the appeal in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>