<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 67 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the company regarding the classification of industrial solvents under the Central Excise Tariff. The company&#039;s products were classified under Chapter Heading 2710.90 and 2713.30 instead of the department&#039;s proposed classification under Chapter Heading 2710.13. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the department&#039;s classification and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed allegations of the company suppressing material facts for duty evasion, maintaining the company&#039;s correct classification under Chapter 27 and ruling out the need for additional duty or penal action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 13:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 67 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the company regarding the classification of industrial solvents under the Central Excise Tariff. The company&#039;s products were classified under Chapter Heading 2710.90 and 2713.30 instead of the department&#039;s proposed classification under Chapter Heading 2710.13. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the department&#039;s classification and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed allegations of the company suppressing material facts for duty evasion, maintaining the company&#039;s correct classification under Chapter 27 and ruling out the need for additional duty or penal action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>