<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (5) TMI 267 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276216</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 was construed to give an inclusive meaning to &quot;agricultural produce,&quot; including items covered by the Schedule and commodities added by notification. The expression &quot;or otherwise&quot; was treated as an independent enlarging phrase, so ejusdem generis could not be used to narrow the statutory language. The State Government&#039;s power under Section 40 to notify additional commodities was upheld, and timber was treated as validly brought within the Schedule. Once the Act and notification covered the item, no separate enquiry was required into whether the commodity was itself agriculturally produced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 12:45:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (5) TMI 267 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276216</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 was construed to give an inclusive meaning to &quot;agricultural produce,&quot; including items covered by the Schedule and commodities added by notification. The expression &quot;or otherwise&quot; was treated as an independent enlarging phrase, so ejusdem generis could not be used to narrow the statutory language. The State Government&#039;s power under Section 40 to notify additional commodities was upheld, and timber was treated as validly brought within the Schedule. Once the Act and notification covered the item, no separate enquiry was required into whether the commodity was itself agriculturally produced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>