<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1490 - ATPMLA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276213</link>
    <description>Property constituting proceeds of crime may be provisionally attached under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act even if it is mortgaged to a bank and the bank is not charged with the scheduled offence. The Tribunal treated the later proviso to sections 2(p), 2(u), 3 and 5 as clarificatory and held that attachment can extend to property in possession of any person where the property itself is linked to money laundering. Prior SARFAESI recovery steps did not bar attachment, because the two statutes operate in different fields: PMLA targets proceeds of crime, while SARFAESI is a debt-recovery mechanism. The mortgage was only an encumbrance, leaving the attachment power intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 09:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1490 - ATPMLA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276213</link>
      <description>Property constituting proceeds of crime may be provisionally attached under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act even if it is mortgaged to a bank and the bank is not charged with the scheduled offence. The Tribunal treated the later proviso to sections 2(p), 2(u), 3 and 5 as clarificatory and held that attachment can extend to property in possession of any person where the property itself is linked to money laundering. Prior SARFAESI recovery steps did not bar attachment, because the two statutes operate in different fields: PMLA targets proceeds of crime, while SARFAESI is a debt-recovery mechanism. The mortgage was only an encumbrance, leaving the attachment power intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>