<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Restriction u/s 16(4) of CGST Act applicable on services received under RCM also</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114290</link>
    <description>Restriction under Section 16(4) bars input tax credit after the earlier of the September return deadline following the financial year or the filing of the annual return, and this cut-off applies equally to supplies for which tax is discharged by the recipient under the reverse charge mechanism. If tax under reverse charge was paid after the date on which it was due, interest may be payable for the delayed payment, so the actual payment date under RCM is consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 07:50:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Restriction u/s 16(4) of CGST Act applicable on services received under RCM also</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114290</link>
      <description>Restriction under Section 16(4) bars input tax credit after the earlier of the September return deadline following the financial year or the filing of the annual return, and this cut-off applies equally to supplies for which tax is discharged by the recipient under the reverse charge mechanism. If tax under reverse charge was paid after the date on which it was due, interest may be payable for the delayed payment, so the actual payment date under RCM is consequential.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 07:50:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>