<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (11) TMI 163 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276209</link>
    <description>A nationalised bank constituted under the banking nationalisation statute was treated as a body corporate created by special Indian law, so the agriculturists&#039; debt relief enactment did not apply against it. The same decision noted that interest at 11 1/2 per cent per annum with half-yearly rests amounted to compound interest, and in agriculturists&#039; loan matters the Usurious Loans Act raises a presumption that such charging is excessive unless rebutted by special circumstances. As no rebuttal evidence was produced, the compound interest was held excessive, and only simple interest at 11 1/2 per cent up to suit and 6 per cent thereafter was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 18:10:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (11) TMI 163 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276209</link>
      <description>A nationalised bank constituted under the banking nationalisation statute was treated as a body corporate created by special Indian law, so the agriculturists&#039; debt relief enactment did not apply against it. The same decision noted that interest at 11 1/2 per cent per annum with half-yearly rests amounted to compound interest, and in agriculturists&#039; loan matters the Usurious Loans Act raises a presumption that such charging is excessive unless rebutted by special circumstances. As no rebuttal evidence was produced, the compound interest was held excessive, and only simple interest at 11 1/2 per cent up to suit and 6 per cent thereafter was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>