https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276199 A tenant's writ challenge to a landlord's release application under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act concerned whether the appellate authority had properly dealt with affidavits filed in defence, including the objection that they were sworn before a Notary rather than an Oath Commissioner. The tenant argued that relevant evidence was ignored and that any defect should either have been rejected earlier or cured, since procedural rules should not defeat justice. The High Court found the appellate judgment unsustainable, quashed it, and remanded the matter for fresh decision with a direction for expeditious disposal. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Nov 2018 15:38:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276199 A tenant's writ challenge to a landlord's release application under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act concerned whether the appellate authority had properly dealt with affidavits filed in defence, including the objection that they were sworn before a Notary rather than an Oath Commissioner. The tenant argued that relevant evidence was ignored and that any defect should either have been rejected earlier or cured, since procedural rules should not defeat justice. The High Court found the appellate judgment unsustainable, quashed it, and remanded the matter for fresh decision with a direction for expeditious disposal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276199