https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369713 The High Court of Allahabad ordered the release of the petitioner's detained goods and vehicle after noting a circular allowing minor discrepancies in E-way bills. The petitioner, a registered dealer, had paid the requisite tax as per the invoice, and the discrepancy in the vehicle number on the E-way bill did not warrant detention under the U.P. GST Act. The court directed the release upon the petitioner furnishing an indemnity bond equivalent to the tax and penalty liability, emphasizing the circular's significance to avoid unnecessary detentions due to minor errors in E-way bills. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 15:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369713 The High Court of Allahabad ordered the release of the petitioner's detained goods and vehicle after noting a circular allowing minor discrepancies in E-way bills. The petitioner, a registered dealer, had paid the requisite tax as per the invoice, and the discrepancy in the vehicle number on the E-way bill did not warrant detention under the U.P. GST Act. The court directed the release upon the petitioner furnishing an indemnity bond equivalent to the tax and penalty liability, emphasizing the circular's significance to avoid unnecessary detentions due to minor errors in E-way bills. Case-Laws GST Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369713