<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 52 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369709</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition, advising the petitioner to pursue available appellate remedies and not expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits. The court emphasized that the issues involved were mixed questions of fact and law, best decided by appellate authorities. The petitioner was instructed to comply with requisitions in letters and file a return of income, with the opportunity to challenge any adverse reassessment order in appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 52 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369709</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition, advising the petitioner to pursue available appellate remedies and not expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits. The court emphasized that the issues involved were mixed questions of fact and law, best decided by appellate authorities. The petitioner was instructed to comply with requisitions in letters and file a return of income, with the opportunity to challenge any adverse reassessment order in appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>