<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 51 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369708</link>
    <description>Interim protection was sought in an appeal disputing whether remittances constituted royalty and whether tax had to be deducted at source on that basis. The Court admitted the appeal and issued notice to the respondent, but found no basis on the existing record to grant interim restraint. The stay application was dismissed, and no interim relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 13:56:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 51 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369708</link>
      <description>Interim protection was sought in an appeal disputing whether remittances constituted royalty and whether tax had to be deducted at source on that basis. The Court admitted the appeal and issued notice to the respondent, but found no basis on the existing record to grant interim restraint. The stay application was dismissed, and no interim relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>