<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 46 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369703</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked authority to levy fees under Section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015 while processing TDS statements. The demands for fees were deemed invalid and deleted, resulting in the appeals of the assessees being allowed. The delay in filing appeals was condoned by the Tribunal, emphasizing the importance of substantial justice over technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 13:55:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 46 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369703</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked authority to levy fees under Section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015 while processing TDS statements. The demands for fees were deemed invalid and deleted, resulting in the appeals of the assessees being allowed. The delay in filing appeals was condoned by the Tribunal, emphasizing the importance of substantial justice over technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>