<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 42 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369699</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes as the Accountant Member found that the CIT(A) had not followed the principles of natural justice by not confronting the assessee with the gathered information. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after providing the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 42 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369699</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes as the Accountant Member found that the CIT(A) had not followed the principles of natural justice by not confronting the assessee with the gathered information. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after providing the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>