https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369694 Reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages was found inappropriate where the workman had served only as a casual employee for a short period, significant time had passed since termination, and there was no evidence of continued unemployment. In these circumstances, the Labour Court could properly exercise its power under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act to award lump sum compensation instead of reinstatement with consequential benefits. The reinstatement direction was therefore modified and compensation substituted in its place. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Nov 2018 13:53:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369694 Reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages was found inappropriate where the workman had served only as a casual employee for a short period, significant time had passed since termination, and there was no evidence of continued unemployment. In these circumstances, the Labour Court could properly exercise its power under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act to award lump sum compensation instead of reinstatement with consequential benefits. The reinstatement direction was therefore modified and compensation substituted in its place. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369694