https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369689 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on points related to the qualification of services provided to foreign network firms as Export of Services and eligibility for exemption from service tax for services provided to a specific company. The Tribunal also found in favor of the appellant regarding the applicability of Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules for availing CENVAT credit without separate accounts. However, the Tribunal upheld the tax liability under the reverse charge mechanism for services procured from a foreign Chartered Accountants Firm post 18.04.2006. The demands, interest, and penalties were confirmed accordingly. en-us Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369689 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on points related to the qualification of services provided to foreign network firms as Export of Services and eligibility for exemption from service tax for services provided to a specific company. The Tribunal also found in favor of the appellant regarding the applicability of Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules for availing CENVAT credit without separate accounts. However, the Tribunal upheld the tax liability under the reverse charge mechanism for services procured from a foreign Chartered Accountants Firm post 18.04.2006. The demands, interest, and penalties were confirmed accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369689