<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 30 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369687</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and remanded the matters to the Original Adjudication Authority due to jurisdictional errors in processing refund claims. It emphasized the importance of proper jurisdictional assessment and transfer of claims to the correct authority for fair adjudication, highlighting the need to follow jurisdictional protocols in handling refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 30 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369687</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and remanded the matters to the Original Adjudication Authority due to jurisdictional errors in processing refund claims. It emphasized the importance of proper jurisdictional assessment and transfer of claims to the correct authority for fair adjudication, highlighting the need to follow jurisdictional protocols in handling refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>