https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369686 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI held that services provided by the appellant should be classified as 'works contract service' both before and after 1st June 2007. The tribunal found the tax demand under 'Erection, commissioning and installation service (ECIS)' prior to 1st June 2007 to be incorrect and set aside the demand for the period from 1st June 2007 to 31st March 2010 due to the absence of a proposal in the show cause notice for tax under 'works contract service'. The tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper classification of services and adherence to procedural requirements in tax notices. en-us Thu, 18 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Nov 2018 13:53:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369686 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI held that services provided by the appellant should be classified as 'works contract service' both before and after 1st June 2007. The tribunal found the tax demand under 'Erection, commissioning and installation service (ECIS)' prior to 1st June 2007 to be incorrect and set aside the demand for the period from 1st June 2007 to 31st March 2010 due to the absence of a proposal in the show cause notice for tax under 'works contract service'. The tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper classification of services and adherence to procedural requirements in tax notices. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 18 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369686