<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 12 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369669</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed as the slag generated as waste during the manufacture of steel was deemed not to attract Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules. The Judicial Member concluded that the slag is a waste product arising during the production of dutiable final products and does not fall under Rule 6. Previous tribunal decisions and court cases were cited to support this stance, leading to the setting aside of the previous orders demanding payment equal to 6% of the value of the slag.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 19:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 12 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369669</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed as the slag generated as waste during the manufacture of steel was deemed not to attract Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules. The Judicial Member concluded that the slag is a waste product arising during the production of dutiable final products and does not fall under Rule 6. Previous tribunal decisions and court cases were cited to support this stance, leading to the setting aside of the previous orders demanding payment equal to 6% of the value of the slag.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>