https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369662 The court allowed both writ petitions, quashing the impugned notices demanding tax arrears and encumbrance on the petitioner's share of the subject property. It was held that the petitioner, not being a director or shareholder of the company in arrears, should not be held liable for the company's tax debts solely based on being an heir of directors. The court emphasized the petitioner's lack of involvement in the company post-directors' demise and ownership of a 1/4 share in the property. Legal action against the company for arrears was permitted, but the encumbrance on the petitioner's share was directed to be removed. en-us Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Nov 2018 10:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369662 The court allowed both writ petitions, quashing the impugned notices demanding tax arrears and encumbrance on the petitioner's share of the subject property. It was held that the petitioner, not being a director or shareholder of the company in arrears, should not be held liable for the company's tax debts solely based on being an heir of directors. The court emphasized the petitioner's lack of involvement in the company post-directors' demise and ownership of a 1/4 share in the property. Legal action against the company for arrears was permitted, but the encumbrance on the petitioner's share was directed to be removed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369662