<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 3 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369660</link>
    <description>Administrative cancellation of registration under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act could not be acted on immediately where the record did not show the reasons, notice, or prior hearing; the registration was temporarily restored and any cancellation was required to proceed only after show cause notice, reply, and hearing in accordance with law. The petitioner was also allowed to seek deletion from the list of non-genuine dealers by representation, to be considered expeditiously after observing natural justice. No writ relief was granted in respect of the FIR, leaving the petitioner to pursue the appropriate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 13:51:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 3 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369660</link>
      <description>Administrative cancellation of registration under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act could not be acted on immediately where the record did not show the reasons, notice, or prior hearing; the registration was temporarily restored and any cancellation was required to proceed only after show cause notice, reply, and hearing in accordance with law. The petitioner was also allowed to seek deletion from the list of non-genuine dealers by representation, to be considered expeditiously after observing natural justice. No writ relief was granted in respect of the FIR, leaving the petitioner to pursue the appropriate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>