<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1485 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276178</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Relying on the Ahaar Consumer Products Pvt. Ltd. case, it found that Section 194C and Section 201(1)/201(1A) were not applicable to the situation. The decision was based on the nature of the transaction as an exchange rather than a works contract, leading to the rejection of the tax demand for non/short deduction of tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 13:50:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1485 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276178</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Relying on the Ahaar Consumer Products Pvt. Ltd. case, it found that Section 194C and Section 201(1)/201(1A) were not applicable to the situation. The decision was based on the nature of the transaction as an exchange rather than a works contract, leading to the rejection of the tax demand for non/short deduction of tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>