<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 452 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276163</link>
    <description>Under Order 21 Rule 57 CPC, dismissal of an execution application for default ordinarily ends the attachment unless the court orders otherwise, but restoration of the execution proceedings revives the ancillary attachment for the period when it was effective. Because the private transfers were made while the attachment still subsisted and before dismissal for default, Section 64 CPC rendered those alienations void against the decree-holder. Authorities dealing with transfers made in the gap between dismissal and restoration were therefore inapplicable on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 12:14:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 452 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276163</link>
      <description>Under Order 21 Rule 57 CPC, dismissal of an execution application for default ordinarily ends the attachment unless the court orders otherwise, but restoration of the execution proceedings revives the ancillary attachment for the period when it was effective. Because the private transfers were made while the attachment still subsisted and before dismissal for default, Section 64 CPC rendered those alienations void against the decree-holder. Authorities dealing with transfers made in the gap between dismissal and restoration were therefore inapplicable on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>