<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 735 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276162</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the property sale due to the respondent&#039;s failure to make full payment within the specified time. The court ordered a fresh sale through re-advertisement with specific terms, including a minimum offer of Rs. 1 crore, participation of both parties in bidding, and the return of earnest money to the respondent. The re-advertisement process was to be completed within three weeks to ensure fairness and transparency in the sale process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 12:03:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 735 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276162</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the property sale due to the respondent&#039;s failure to make full payment within the specified time. The court ordered a fresh sale through re-advertisement with specific terms, including a minimum offer of Rs. 1 crore, participation of both parties in bidding, and the return of earnest money to the respondent. The re-advertisement process was to be completed within three weeks to ensure fairness and transparency in the sale process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>