<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 22 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15023</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the cancellation of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), emphasizing the absence of deliberateness or mens rea in the assessee&#039;s actions. The court ruled that the controversy over the terms &quot;deliberate&quot; and &quot;mens rea&quot; was not pivotal in this case, as the assessee&#039;s explanation was accepted, and there was no basis to deem the return as false. The court concluded that deliberateness or mens rea was not a prerequisite for penalty proceedings in this instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:44:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 22 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15023</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the cancellation of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), emphasizing the absence of deliberateness or mens rea in the assessee&#039;s actions. The court ruled that the controversy over the terms &quot;deliberate&quot; and &quot;mens rea&quot; was not pivotal in this case, as the assessee&#039;s explanation was accepted, and there was no basis to deem the return as false. The court concluded that deliberateness or mens rea was not a prerequisite for penalty proceedings in this instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>