<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 18 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15018</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court applied its earlier ruling in CIT v. Paramount Premises (P.) Ltd. and rejected the contrary position advanced in the matter. The text reflects reliance on binding precedent as the decisive legal point, with no further factual or statutory reasoning provided in the excerpt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 18 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15018</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court applied its earlier ruling in CIT v. Paramount Premises (P.) Ltd. and rejected the contrary position advanced in the matter. The text reflects reliance on binding precedent as the decisive legal point, with no further factual or statutory reasoning provided in the excerpt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>