<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1610 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369644</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition challenging the Notice of reopening for Assessment Year 2013-14, allowing the Assessing Officer to proceed with reassessment under Section 2(22)(e) provisions. The Court held that the Assessing Officer had a reasonable belief of income escapement, justifying the reassessment. The petitioner&#039;s argument on voting rights was deemed addressable during assessment proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:44:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1610 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369644</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition challenging the Notice of reopening for Assessment Year 2013-14, allowing the Assessing Officer to proceed with reassessment under Section 2(22)(e) provisions. The Court held that the Assessing Officer had a reasonable belief of income escapement, justifying the reassessment. The petitioner&#039;s argument on voting rights was deemed addressable during assessment proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>