<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1594 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369628</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80IB is available to a composite industrial undertaking where several connected units together carry out the manufacturing process and produce a single marketable product. Physical separation of activities such as cutting, stitching, storage, buttoning and packing does not make each location a separate independent undertaking when the operations are interlinked. Separate books of account for each physical unit are not required in such a case, because the units form parts of the same manufacturing set-up. A partner&#039;s statement alone was insufficient to displace this position, and the disallowance of the deduction was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 20:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1594 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369628</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80IB is available to a composite industrial undertaking where several connected units together carry out the manufacturing process and produce a single marketable product. Physical separation of activities such as cutting, stitching, storage, buttoning and packing does not make each location a separate independent undertaking when the operations are interlinked. Separate books of account for each physical unit are not required in such a case, because the units form parts of the same manufacturing set-up. A partner&#039;s statement alone was insufficient to displace this position, and the disallowance of the deduction was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>