<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1568 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369602</link>
    <description>The petitioners challenged the rejection of their request to drop show cause notices for confirmation of demand and refund of a deposited amount. The court found that the conditions imposed could not override relevant policy provisions. Consequently, all impugned orders were quashed, the demand was not enforced, and the deposited amount was ordered to be refunded by a specified date to avoid interest liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1568 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369602</link>
      <description>The petitioners challenged the rejection of their request to drop show cause notices for confirmation of demand and refund of a deposited amount. The court found that the conditions imposed could not override relevant policy provisions. Consequently, all impugned orders were quashed, the demand was not enforced, and the deposited amount was ordered to be refunded by a specified date to avoid interest liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>