https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369601 A petition under Section 482 CrPC was held not maintainable where the petitioners had already pursued revision, because inherent jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision except in exceptional cases. The Court also declined to quash Section 138 NI Act complaints at the threshold: the cheques had been dishonoured and demand notices issued, while the defence based on alleged absence of liability, tenancy adjustment, and security deposit refund raised disputed factual and civil issues requiring evidence. Those disputes could not negate the prima facie ingredients of the offence or justify interference at the quashing stage. en-us Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:10:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369601 A petition under Section 482 CrPC was held not maintainable where the petitioners had already pursued revision, because inherent jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision except in exceptional cases. The Court also declined to quash Section 138 NI Act complaints at the threshold: the cheques had been dishonoured and demand notices issued, while the defence based on alleged absence of liability, tenancy adjustment, and security deposit refund raised disputed factual and civil issues requiring evidence. Those disputes could not negate the prima facie ingredients of the offence or justify interference at the quashing stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369601