<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1558 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369592</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, an air cargo agent, in a service tax dispute. The Department&#039;s contention that the appellants should pay service tax on freight charges reimbursed from customers was rejected. The Tribunal found that taxing the margin on the gross amount collected was incorrect and that the collected amount should not be treated as a service provided to customers. The Tribunal emphasized that no service tax should be demanded on the difference between the amount collected from customers and paid to airlines. The appellants were not liable to discharge service tax on the total value realized from customers, and the appeals were allowed based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1558 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369592</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, an air cargo agent, in a service tax dispute. The Department&#039;s contention that the appellants should pay service tax on freight charges reimbursed from customers was rejected. The Tribunal found that taxing the margin on the gross amount collected was incorrect and that the collected amount should not be treated as a service provided to customers. The Tribunal emphasized that no service tax should be demanded on the difference between the amount collected from customers and paid to airlines. The appellants were not liable to discharge service tax on the total value realized from customers, and the appeals were allowed based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>