<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1554 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369588</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellant was entitled to the CENVAT credit despite procedural lapses in mentioning the vendor&#039;s service tax registration number on input invoices. Emphasizing the importance of substantial compliance and lack of deliberate violation, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the relief sought and cautioning against denying credits based solely on technical errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:09:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1554 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369588</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellant was entitled to the CENVAT credit despite procedural lapses in mentioning the vendor&#039;s service tax registration number on input invoices. Emphasizing the importance of substantial compliance and lack of deliberate violation, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the relief sought and cautioning against denying credits based solely on technical errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>